January 17th 2007 - Greg
McErlean
(Director of major
projects, the Royal Parks Foundation)

The Restoration of Bushy Park


Bushy is the old deer
park of Hampton Court and the second largest of The Royal Parks. It
covers a vast area (445 hectares) and welcomes over two million visitors
a year. Bushy Park may be the least known of the eight Royal Parks, but
it has a fascinating history. From being the birthplace of hockey to
housing General Eisenhower’s HQ during the planning and executing of
D-Day, Bushy is an important London landmark that deserves to be
cherished. Now, thanks to a grant of £4.5 million from the Heritage
Lottery Fund, we can do just that.

Restoration Project
Bushy Park is the 'Sleeping Beauty' of the Royal Parks. It is a truly
grand landscape, which mixes formal avenues, statues and gardens with
the wild appeal of a country park. Historic under-investment has taken
its toll, and now this important London landmark deserves to be
cherished.
Some highlights of the restoration are the Arethusa 'Diana' Fountain,
the magical Woodland Gardens and a brand new visitor welcome centre at
Broom Clumps, which will act as a focal point for visitors.
Notes on the Lunch
Meeting at the Antoinette Hotel
The Chairman, John
Moore opened the meeting by asking for a minute’s silence in memory of our
late member, John Turner, then invited the Events Secretary, David Ashen to
inform members about the proposed holidays for 2007. These were to consist
of a four day stay at the Ramada Hotel, Norwich from the 19th to
the 23rd April 2007 and a six day trip from the 19th to 25th
August to the Alsace region of France. This would mean staying four nights
at the Holiday Inn, Strasbourg with overnight stops on the outward and
return journeys. Timing was due to the European Parliament sitting in
September. However, the Events Secretary explained that the Committee
thought it might be prudent to delay the Alsace holiday until September 2008
(if possible) and substitute a four day trip in September this year to
Lille.
The Deputy Chairman
then proposed the Loyal Toast, after which he introduced the Speaker, Greg
McErlean. Greg is a Director of Major Projects at the Royal Parks
Foundation. He has worked 10 years for the organisation and for five years
on a long term project for Bushy Park.
Superficially the
Park appears fine but scratch the surface and you can find 50 years of
neglect compared to Hampton Court. The Park was damaged by the storms of
1987and the floods of 2000 and suffers from wear and tear, with rotting
paths and many areas inaccessible. The object of the restoration is to
conserve the Park and make it a great place for people to enjoy.
An outline of the
history was provided. The Park has been around for 500 years and medieval
field boundaries are still evident. Henry VIII acquired the Park in three
or four parts. Its present form dates back to 1620. It always had strong
association with people- Henry VII to Eisenhower, cold war history and
social history.
Early bids for
lottery funds were unsuccessful but by 2001, 96 projects were identified.
Today 67 projects are going ahead in a 2 stage process with the help of the
Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF). Work is planned to finish in 2009.
Sample projects were
then described in detail, fully illustrated with the aid of coloured
slides. The first one was the Upper Lodge Water Gardens which date from
1709. These include pools which supply water to the Hampton Court fountains
and are angular in shape due to field boundaries. Paintings showed what the
area originally looked like but conservation is the aim of HLF, so the two
pools will not be fully restored. The Brewhouse, which suffered badly from
vandalism, is to be repaired and is scheduled to become an Ancient Monument.
Work starts this summer and it is hoped that the Brewhouse will reopen in
summer 2008.
Another project is
the Arethusa Fountain, better known as the Diana Fountain. The base is
covered in motifs and the Fountain has 26 water jets when fully working.
The Royal Parks Community Ecologist, Dr Nigel Reeve, checked for exotic
spiders before work started.
The next project
described was the 50 year old Woodland Gardens. Here a Welcome Centre at
Broom Clumps is planned, with horticultural gardens and speaking, walking
and acting groups encouraged to make use of the amphitheatre. Also planned
is a new, less obtrusive, car park, a sit down café and new public toilets.
Other projects
include education and community involvement,, volunteer groups , access
improvement, further repairs and plans to minimise the impact of traffic.
Fundraising is
important and money is still required. Six million pounds is needed of
which four million will come from HLF. The Royal Parks Foundation is a
registered charity. There have been 20 public meetings to engage people in
the Park restoration project. The programme management is by the Partnership
Steering Group, consisting of six individual groups, and the internal
Programme Board.
Greg concluded by
saying that construction of the Welcome Centre is shortly going out to
tender. When the projects are completed the Park will look much as before
but it will actually be in much better shape.
Questions were
invited and topics covered were public transport to the Park, location of
the Water Gardens, the support of Friends of Bushy Park and on the White
House, which is known as the Stockyard.
After answering
questions, Greg commented he was disappointed that he was unable to arrive
in time to enjoy the lunch. He had a number of leaflets which were available
to members.
The Chairman
proposed a vote of thanks to our Speaker and the meeting closed with the
Probus Toast at 3.15p.m.
Brian
Jackson
February 21 st -
“Victim
Support “by Richard Ferris
Notes on the Lunch Meeting at the
Antoinette Hotel
The Chairman, John Moore,
opened the Meeting by asking for one minute’s silence in memory of our
late Members Alex Wood and Jack Pateman. He took the opportunity of
reminding Members that the life of the Club depends on new Members and
that it us up to the present Membership to bring along their friends
among who lies the best hope of finding new Members and thereby
guaranteeing our future.
The Chairman then welcomed
our Speaker, Richard Ferris, he then announced that Life Membership had
been conferred by unanimous vote of the Committee on Laurie Bower and
Geoff Isaac, the former for his long service as General Secretary of the
Club, the latter on his attainment of the age of 90.
A
sub Committee had been entertained at Glenmore House and reported
favourably on its facilities. The ladies’ Lunch will be held at Glenmore
in May 2007 after which Members will be asked to express their views on
the possibility of adopting this as our permanent venue. If any change
is voted for, this will take effect from July.
The
Events Secretary updated Members on the arrangements with York’s for the
Norfolk holiday break.
The
Chairman then proposed the Loyal Toast after which he introduced the
Speaker Richard Ferris. Richard is a Chartered Accountant and during his
career spent several years in South Africa where he specialised in
retail distribution.
Richard’s first remark was that he expected most of us to have heard of
Victim Support but guessed that few members of the general public are
likely to have much idea about what VICTIM SUPPORT does. In the Queen’s
Speech at the opening of the last Parliament there was, in fact, a new
central commitment to making victims central to the criminal justice
system and a green paper was published last year. Among the innovations
promised were the creation of new (separate) units dedicated to victim
and witness support and a raising of the claims threshold; legislation
is expected this year for changes to be rolled out in 2008.
The
basic objectives of VICTIM SUPPORT are to provide emotional and
practical support to victims, to support witnesses attending Crown and
Magistrates courts and to provide certain supplementary services e.g. to
young victims
Richard foresaw particular challenges ahead for VICTIM SUPPORT in the
immediate and medium term. Some of these are administrative or derived
from changes in the criminal justice system or arising through
implementation f the green paper. Others will relate to the results of
new services already being trailed in Nottingham, Salford and Yorks.
Some areas will need to look into indifferent service and quality issues
(but not in South West London). And funding agencies are increasingly
looking for more accountability.
The
picture so far as Kingston is concerned is very favourable. It has the
lowest crime rate in London, which continues to fall, it has a low drug
problem one of the best detection rates and is one of the safest London
boroughs.
Kingston Victim Support is an independent registered charity with its
own management committee and trustees. There are four office staff
supporting fifty volunteers. The core funder is the Home Office
providing at present £55 000 p.a. and the agency receives enquiries
presently running at c4, 500 a year. These usually result in a first
contact by letter or in the case of a serious crime a phone call. VICTIM
SUPPORT provides victims with “emotional and practical support – not
counselling”. Witnesses attending magistrates’ courts are helped by
briefing those unfamiliar with court procedures and there is advice
specific to family courts and where video links are in use.
The
two clusters of offences requiring victim support are categorised as
hate crimes and domestic violence. The first include racism, homophobic
issues and bullying. On domestic violence Richard offered the following
statistics
-
25% of murders in London are domestic related
-
Three women in UK die every day from domestic violence
-
In
90% of domestic violence cases children are in the same or the next
room
-
A
partner can be abused as much as 35 times before making a report to
the police.
As
a borough with a particular racial community - some 15% of Kingston
residents are Korean – it might be expected that there are particular
crime related issues with this group. On the whole Korean victims in
tend, in fact, not to report their difficulties but there are five
Korean speaking volunteers and inroads are gradually being made into the
community, but progress is slow.
Richard asked for questions and reflections from the audience. Ken Smith
observed that despite the relatively favourable profile of the borough
it is still a fact that elderly people are increasingly afraid to go
into central Kingston at night. In this sense we are all victims without
necessarily suffering physical abuse. However, the increasing presence
of policemen on the streets is beginning to have an effect. Laurie Bower
deplored the failure of victims to give evidence which is perhaps a
result of weak sanctions when there is a conviction.
In
conclusion the Chairman proposed a vote of thanks to our speaker and the
session concluded with the Probus Toast at 3.10 p.m.
Brian Jackson
March 21 st - The Quest for Camelot - Lionel Beer
In
the second half of the 6th Century AD, the ancient Britons inhabited the
land all the way from Cornwall up the Western half of England, and into
Scotland as far as the River Forth which flows past Stirling, and also
up to the River Clyde on which the City of Glasgow now stands. So the
Western side of England and all Southern Scotland was inhabited by the
ancient Britons in the 6th Century AD. These ancient Britons shared a
common language, and common background, legends and mythology, so the
legends of Arthur could originate in any region where the Britons dwelt.
Notes on the Lunch Meeting at the
Antoinette Hotel
After Grace the Chairman then
welcomed our Speaker, Lionel Beer, following which John Moore
announced that the Ladies’ Lunch booking forms would be
distributed next month and drew attention to the location of the
venue, Glenmore House, directions to which are to be found on
the Spring edition of the Newsletter.
The Events Secretary
announced that plans for the Norfolk trip starting April 18th,
2007 were now finalised but added that a further five travellers
could be accommodated. He also drew attention to boards which
were circulating, giving members the opportunity of notifying
their intention to attend the next pub lunch at the Star,
Chessington on 4th April.
The Chairman then proposed
the Loyal Toast after which he introduced the Speaker, Lionel
Beer.
Lionel was born in Paignton,
Devon and now lives in Hampton. He is a Founder member of the
UFO Research Association, a subject in which he has an abiding
interest, having been for some time a bookseller specialising in
works about ancient and modern mysteries. Lionel has himself
written a book about the Moving Statue of Ballinspittle. He also
founded the Metropolitan Water Board Railway Society, the object
of which is to restore the 2ft gauge line between the Thames and
the Great (Steam) Engine at Kempton Park. He is an enthusiastic
reader of the Fortean times.
In his own introductory
remarks Lionel identified himself as a sceptic about global
warming – not of the observable phenomena, but the attribution
of the effects to CO2 produced by human activity. In this he
acknowledged himself a heretic.
His subject of Camelot
involved a double mystery: the location of the site and the
identity of the King whose court it was. Arthur was
traditionally born in Tintagel and buried at Glastonbury and was
of Romano British descent, defending the island against the
invading Saxons. Other traditions identify him with Scottish or
Welsh local leaders but our main source is Geoffrey of Monmouth
wrote in the first half of the twelfth century contemporaneously
with Chrétien de Troyes. But most of the earlier source material
is now lost.

Lionel’s talk was well
illustrated by slides and he took us from Caldey Island (above),
off the south coast of Wales to an island off Bardsea in
Cumbria- supposedly the birthplace of Merlin- to numerous other
sites on the British mainland. Among these were Montgomery in
Powys, near Offa’s Dyke, Winchester, the vale of Crucis Abbey
near Llangollen, and a curious giant obelisk in Trent Park North
London and so on. A Round Table is extant in Winchester and
dates from the late thirteenth century. There is also a
(fifteenth century) round table in Sterling and even something
similar in the Isle of Man.
There was very much else: at
least an hour’s talk compressed into half that time. There is
absolutely no doubt that the Arthurian legend has gripped the
imagination in these islands for more than a millennium and
Lionel’s talk was witness of one man’s amazing obsession.
Because of slow service from the Antoinette Hotel there was,
sadly, little time for questions at the end and following the
Probus toast we dispersed at approximately 3.30p.m.
April 18 th - The Work of the RSPB - Roger Tomlinson

The
RSPB is the UK charity working to secure a healthy environment for birds
and other wildlife, helping to create a better world for us all. We rely
upon memberships and donations to fund our work.
Our work is driven by a passionate belief that we all have a
responsibility to protect birds and the environment. Bird populations
reflect the health of the planet on which our future depends.
The need for an effective bird conservation organisation has never been
greater. Climate change, agricultural intensification, expansion of
urban areas and transport infrastructure, and over-exploitation of our
seas all pose major threats to birds.
The RSPB could not exist without its supporters and members. Whether you
join us, give a donation, purchase items from us or undertake voluntary
work, your support is vital to the future of birds and the places where
they live.
Notes on the Lunch Meeting at the Antoinette Hotel
After Grace the Chairman conveyed apologies for absence he then welcomed
our Speaker Roger Tomlinson following which John Moore announced
Members’ birthdays.
The
Chairman then announced that envelopes were available for collection
containing application form for the Ladies’ Lunch and an explanatory
Notice about the referendum on a permanent change of venue.
The
Events Secretary then outlined proposals for a visit to France in the
autumn with a view to ascertaining the general level of interest. This
was assessed on a show of hands and proved encouraging enough for the
Events Secretary to undertake to have a detailed and costed programme
ready for distribution at the Ladies’ Lunch.
The
Chairman then proposed the Loyal Toast after which he introduced the
Speaker, Roger Tomlinson. Roger joined the Royal Society for the
Protection of Birds a year ago as Community Talks Officer for the London
area. He had originally trained as a photographer after which he spent a
number of years writing. Three years of that period were passed in
Sicily where he still has a number of friends. He says his knowledge of
birds still has room for improvement but (attributable to experience in
a zoo) he is particularly sound on penguins.
The
RSPB was founded 110 years ago and currently has a membership of around
a million. These are subscribers, but upwards of 13,000 are volunteers
who assist the Society with its manifold activities. A lot of this is
research but the Society owns and actively manages a number of actual
sites: their mission is “protecting birds and the places where they
live”. A popular (populist?) recent survey has been to determine
Britain’s Favourite Bird. The medal is currently held by the Robin which
seems to return Britain’s affection, in that it seems to be tamer here
than on the Continent.
Campaigns have long been an aspect of the Society’s work. A recent
example was the proposal to build a new airport for London on the
marshes at Cliffe, north of the Medway, threatening many colonies of
wading and other wetland birds. Back in the end of the nineteenth
century women wore hats much more commonly than now and very commonly
with feathers. In 1889 a Mrs. R. Williamson launched a campaign against
the plumage trade and by1908 had won it with a ban against the
importation of feathers this was effectively the birth of the RSPB. Last
year the Society bought its 200th property, Loch Garten, a
home of the Osprey. The warden there has made the decision to welcome
visitors instead of excluding them and has provided facilities for
viewing. Another former native bird, the Avocet became extinct in this
country in the middle of the nineteenth century because of its
widespread use for fishing flies, but has re-established itself with the
help of the RSPB which has now incorporated it into its logo.
Another extremely popular activity of the RSPB is the annual Garden Bird
Watch which is now the biggest survey of its type in the world. Roger
gave the results of the
Survey, in reverse order as follows:
5th Blackbird
4th The Wood pigeon. 4 to 5 million
estimated
3rd The House Sparrow – a bird
sometimes liked, sometimes persecuted.
Has declined by 50% in the last thirty years. If a
common small bird starts to decline something definite is going on, but
not necessarily one thing. In this case the decline in the supply of
soft bodied insects must have been an important factor.
2nd. The Starling is also in decline
(they were once kept as pets) the males mate haphazardly and females
dump eggs randomly in other birds’ nests .Flocks can be very big indeed
– up to ¼ million birds. Losses vary from area to area but in some cases
have been up to 70% in a 30 – 40 year period.
1st Blue tit. This is a tiny bird –
about the weight of a £1 coin. It needs lots of caterpillars but at 3.3m
is not endangered.
At
the opposite end from the tit in size is the Albatross. These are found
mostly in the Southern Ocean (below the Indian Ocean) and typically
measure 11feet from wingtip to wingtip and have remarkable endurance on
long migratory flights. They lay eggs on alternate years. The Albatross
is endangered. A particular hazard is in the Southern Ocean where the
big commercial fishing fleets use long lines – up to eighty mile in
length. The birds predate the caught fish and then become enmeshed and
drown. Various strategies are being discussed with the fleets- such as
camouflaging the lines, putting them down at night or weighting them.
Fortunately these measures are slowly gaining acceptance.
As
was perhaps to be expected, bearing in mind the subject and Roger’s
personal history, his talk was illustrated by a dazzling succession of
brilliant photographs. At the end of the formal presentation questions
were invited A predictable subject was the ring-necked parakeet.
Although clearly a little cautious about this subject Roger said quite
firmly that the view of the RSPB is that this recent introduction, by
deliberate release or by accident in Kent, in the late sixties is not as
yet a threat. There are now some 10,000 spread around London but there
is no evidence that they are causing harm to other wildlife. However, on
this subject of introductions it is on record that forty pairs of
Starlings were originally introduced in Central Park in New York and the
US population of these birds is now estimated at 500 million.
There were several more questions on individual species – such as the
Starlings at Pat Tumber’s school in Somerset during the war. But a vote
of thanks was carried and at 3.20 p.m. The Chairman proposed the Probus
Toast and closed a very successful meeting.
Brian Jackson
May 16 th - Ladies’ Spring Lunch - John sings - John Stratford
John Stratford, who lives in the Tolworth parish,
will sing a selection of popular songs including Irish ballads and
Italian arias. We are very fortunate that John has agreed to make space
in his busy schedule for this special event – he has had engagements in
many countries and has won several awards, including two cups at the
recent Richmond Festival.
The Ladies’ Spring Lunch will be held in
Glenmore House which is situated in The Crescent, Surbiton. The
Crescent is situated across the gardens which run alongside Claremont
Road in Surbiton. It is just close to Surbiton Station, just past the
Waitrose supermarket where there is a bus-stop. If approaching by road
from Surbiton station, access to The Crescent is a sharp left turn at
the Kingston end of the gardens. There are plenty of parking spaces
behind Glenmore House and the suite that we will use has direct access
from the car park. There is a friendly entrance for people with
disabilities.
The Bar has plenty of seats and tables and
prices are also most reasonable. As an example, a bottle of House wine
is priced at £8.00 and is of excellent quality.





Santa Lucia
La Donna Mobile
Parnis Angelicus
Cora 'ngrato
Una Furtiva Lagrima
Oh Danny Boy
Wind Beneath My Wings
Ave Maria
Sorrento
Chorus of The Hebrew Slaves
Oh My Papa
My Way
Programme devised and presented by John Stratford

Photographs by Michael Johnston
June - Arrive Alive by Mike Whicher
Notes on the
Lunch meeting at the Antoinette Hotel
On Wednesday 20th
June 2007
The Deputy
Chairman, John Goodridge introduced our Speaker, Mike Whicher. Mike’s
role in the Driving Standards Agency is to conduct driving tests and to
make presentations to educational institutions, the armed forces and to
associations like our own. Mike came to road safety from the BBC where
he first worked in IT and then at developing training material for
development courses.
Mike’s
presentation was based on a DVD from which he illustrated his talk
which, of course, centred on the special needs of older drivers. All
drivers have to apply for a new licence on reaching age 70 and the
application form includes a declaration of health. On vision it is
necessary to be able to read a number plate at 20.5 metres (wearing
glasses if prescribed), although total deafness is not a bar to driving.
Having a stroke often leads to the loss of one’s licence, but not in all
cases. Stiffness due to arthritis or other medical condition can reduce
flexibility within the car and therefore impair rapid all round vision.
Panoramic mirrors and parking sensors are recommended and for some
people a switch to automatic transmission should be considered.
There followed
a clip from a pre-war documentary made by Ford films with a pithy
commentary by Sir Donald Campbell. “Never drive like this, chaps.”
Today Mike
claims that the standard of driving test candidates is high; born out by
the 42% pass rate. But evidence on the road is that, although taught to
a high standard, drivers rapidly forget what they have learned. The
bible of driving in the UK is, of course the Highway Code, a manual
which is continuously updated; there have been 500 changes in the law
since 1976. For infractions, ignorance of the law is no defence: typical
lapses relate to seat belts, mobile phones and the various regulations
designed to ensure the safety of children.
Reverting to
the effects of aging, Mike cited confusion arising from the speed of
traffic, absent mindedness, medication, and stress. He strongly
advocates taking breaks at distances of 100 miles or after an hour on
the road, whichever comes first. On the issue of prescribed drugs it is
highly necessary to observe warning such as “do not drive” or “may cause
drowsiness”: in the event of an accident, failure to observe such
warnings can be legally actionable.
Drink driving.
Mike tended to be cautious about unit counting: the only unarguable test
is measuring what is blown into a bag. But a salutary real life example
was that six pints consumed on a Friday night makes driving before Sunday lunchtime questionable. Among common fallacies are that big
meals or coffee can reduce blood alcohol levels.
He then
proceeded to examine certain “hot topics”. Roundabouts were number one
because they are where most accidents occur. All roundabouts are
designed to allow traffic to flow more easily but misunderstandings do
arise. In the case of mini roundabouts, for instance, the answer to “can
you drive over the paint” is basically “no”, but the size of the vehicle
has a bearing. U turns are not permitted and only one vehicle at a time
is permitted. Gyratory systems are very rare but basically involve a
main turning circle and a series of mini roundabouts (up to eight) and
are “best learned in advance”.
Road signs
change frequently and the use of them is not absolutely consistent
nationwide. But the basic “grammar” is that statements in red circles
are mandatory, in triangles are warnings and in rectangles are for
information.
There is
widespread misunderstanding about speed limits. Out of town the basic
rule is that only where there is a central reservation does the 70 limit
apply. Otherwise it is 60 and beware the appearance of speed cameras
just after the end of a central reservation!
Speeds. It can
be as dangerous to drive too slowly as too fast. A common question is
“Should you stop and give way if other drivers don’t want to observe the
limit”. The legal answer to this is that you are only responsible for
your own speed but the common sense one is that it is dangerous to cause
frustration to other road users and it is better to pull in and give
way.
Another common
fallacy: the belief that middle or outside lanes are appropriate for
cruising at some given speed. The law says that only the inside lane is
to be used for ordinary driving: all others are only for overtaking.
There is also an interesting provision only applicable to the M25. You
must always stay in the same lane. Overtaking is not permissible.
Signalling.
This is only for the information of other road users. It is better not
to signal than to give misleading signals.
Hazard
awareness. This subject is not included in the driving test but drivers
are often woefully unaware of what is going on (this was illustrated by
some nail biting clips). A commentary/ drive is very useful: not least
because it slows you down. Ideally a driver should check his mirror
every 6-8 seconds. Children are especially dangerous: smaller and faster
than normal humans.
Hard shoulders
on the motorway are not for a snooze or looking at the map; only stop
for an emergency. (Incidentally Mike says that he uses satnav). Never,
ever, reverse on a motorway.
Mike’s closing
words were also salutary. In a lifetime, barring accidents or
malfeasance, it is only necessary to take the driving test once. But it
is an activity taking place all the time in changing surroundings and in
accordance with changing rules. In our professions and businesses we
kept up with our subjects. The same should apply to our driving.
Mike’s talk
provoked an unusual amount of interest and there were many questions.
One related to signs painted on the road, which are much more common in
the UK than elsewhere in Europe. All these signs are legally binding –
and so woeful when they are not properly maintained. Incidentally, local
authorities are responsible for local roads, the Highways Agency for
trunk routes.
At 3.20 the
Deputy Chairman proposed a vote of thanks to Mike Whicher and then
closed the meeting with the Probus Toast.
Brian
Jackson
July - History of London’s
Water Supply by Ron Howe
pre reading only a report will
follow the presentation
At
the end of the 16th century, London was a thriving, bustling
centre of trade and commerce. The population had increased
enormously, to about 180,000, since Norman times and now faced
an acute shortage of clean drinking water. The River Thames and
its tributaries which had made London such a suitable place for
a port and city were badly polluted.
In Elizabeth
1 time London had no sewerage system separate from its water
supply. Since the 13th and 14th centuries various monarchs and
Parliaments had tried to stop people throwing dung, garbage and
entrails into ditches, rivers and streams but to little effect.
Pollution and the general careless disposal of waste made London
evil-smelling and unhealthy.
Many people
got their water from open water courses. Some depended upon
water-bearers to bring their supply from the river in
barrel-like containers. Other people, often the more wealthy,
obtained their water from shallow wells that tapped the ground
water and in a few cases water was piped to different parts of
the city. However, even these sources were soon contaminated.
In Elizabeth
1 reign, the Corporation of London sought ways of alleviating
the problem of the shortage of clean water. They concentrated on
bringing in more drinking water into the metropolis rather than
trying to stop the pollution of their existing supply. By 1570
the City Corporation had obtained an Act of Parliament to cut a
channel to bring water from Middlesex or Hertfordshire.
In 1580, a
man named Russell suggested building a channel from the River
Colne at Uxbridge to Holborn in north London. Nothing came of
this proposal but at the turn of the century, Edward Colthurst,
a former army captain, made plans to bring water from springs
near Hertford in a channel to Islington. This was to become the
New River.
Was it really
necessary to go so far afield to find a supply of clean water?
The answer probably lies in the quantity of water required and
in the way in which the water could be brought into the capital
and distributed. The Elizabethans' ability to pump water over
long distances was not well developed.
Notes on the Lunch
meeting at Glenmore House
On Wednesday 18th
July 2007
The Chairman
introduced our Speaker, Ron Howe. Ron spent 35 years working for the
Metropolitan Water Board and its successor (in 1988), the Thames Water
Authority. He retired ten years ago and became involved with the Kew
Bridge Steam Museum and then the Metropolitan Water Board Railway
Society of which he is still an active Member.
Ron started by
sketching the early history of London’s water supplies. In Medieval
times the river itself was a common (although dangerous) source of
domestic water and for use in various trades and industries. Then water
from natural springs was channelled into conduits and from thence into
cisterns. The spring at Tyburn was piped into the Great Conduit House in
Cheapside. But by the end of the sixteenth century real shortages were
developing and John Coultard secured letters patent for bringing water
from Hertfordshire into the city. His early efforts ran short of funds
and the enterprise was taken over by Sir Hugh Myddelton, already a
merchant, goldsmith, banker and Member of Parliament who between the
years 1609 and 1613 built a canal, called the New River carrying water
from the springs of Chadwell and Amwell – a distance of nearly forty
miles. Finance was a serious problem during the construction work and
King James agreed to pay half the cost in return for “one half of the
benefit”. To supply his side of the project Myddelton issued shares to
29 “Adventurers”. There were, of course objections and to meet the
protests of certain farmers in the Lea Valley, bridges were constructed
for the safe transit of sheep. The company created by Myddelton was
eventually incorporated into London Merchant Securities one of the
world’s first property companies. Technically the concept of the New
River was simple. The drop was 9” to the mile, plotted with very
elementary surveying equipment and cut with manual tools.
The supply of water to
London continued to be undertaken by a private utility until 1904 when
the whole responsibility was undertaken by the Metropolitan Water Board.
One of the early enterprises of the MWB was the construction of a
waterworks at Kempton Park where massive steam pumps were installed,
powered by coal fired boilers. These boilers consumed 270 tons of coal a
week and were brought by rail to Kempton Park station – the Shepperton
line of the L&SWR. The neighbouring works at Hampton used 760 tons of
coal per week which came by river. River transport was cheaper than rail
but deliveries could be less certain so there was scope for harmonising
the two sources to ensure reliable and cost effective supplies.
For the latter part of
his talk Ron had a wealth of pictorial material covering the Kempton
site and in particular the magnificent narrow gauge railway. There is a
very active railway preservation society which is clearly one of Ron’s
special interests in retirement.
The talk was very well
received but there was, unfortunately very little time for questions
because on this first use of Glenmore House for a Club lunch we had not
been able to keep strictly to our usual timetable.
Brian Jackson
Wednesday
15th August 2007- Experiences as a
Queen’s Messenger by Lieutenant Colonel Kimmins
Notes on the Lunch meeting at Glenmore
House.
After Grace the
Chairman, John Moore welcomed his Guest, Reg Varney and our Speaker,
Lieutenant Colonel John Kimmins, who was to address us on the
subject of the Queen’s Messengers.
The Events Secretary
then updated the Club on the progress of arrangements for the
forthcoming visit to Normandy. Further travellers will still be very
welcome. He also reminded Member that the next Pub Lunch, at the
Queen Elizabeth in Ewell Road, was on the following Wednesday and
gave instructions on how to get there. In speaking of the Normandy
trip he urged Members to refer to our website for details and in
passing remarked on how very impressive this site has become.
After the Loyal
Toast our Speaker introduced our Speaker. John Kimmins had an army
career which started in Sandhurst from where he joined a Cavalry
regiment. On retirement at 55 he became a Queen’s Messenger.
For those who know
little more than that there are such individuals as Queens’
messengers it seems like an easy job: flying Club class everywhere,
earning good salaries, meeting influential people and having very
limited responsibilities. But they cover millions of miles a year.
In that much air time there is much that can go wrong.
The office of
monarch’s messenger is in fact very ancient, going back to 1199 when
King John appointed an individual to deliver secret documents; the
first King’s Messenger identified by name was John Norman appointed
by Richard III in 1485. Methods of transportation have changed
during the centuries, particularly since the eighteenth when the
horse was supplanted by the carriage system. The last time a horse
was known to have been used was in 1949. In search of authentic
stories Jon Kimmins visited the King’s Messenger involved. The
country was Nepal, and then covered diplomatically from Delhi. But
at that time there was no suitable road or airstrip. So the King’s
Messenger set out by train with a secretary to the frontier. At the
border two horses, grooms and Sherpa’s were waiting. The King’s
Messenger changed into diplomatic “whites”, donned a sola toupee,
set out on his horse and ceremoniously entered Kathmandu.
The reference to
trains caused John to reflect that in the last century progress went
backwards for the traveller to near destinations in continental
Europe. When the Silver Arrow to Paris was in operation he could
leave Victoria at 9.15 p.m., dine, sleep comfortably in his suite
and arrive at the Gare du Nord at 9.15 a.m., the entire train having
been transported on a ferry while he slept. Today’s business
traveller leaves Waterloo by Eurostar at 6.20 a.m. to arrive in
Paris by 9.40 to achieve the same full day and then suffers a
journey back in the evening arriving at 9 or 10 p.m.
An amusing railway
incident involved an Italian Count delivering a message to London
from Mussolini who started his journey with a British KM. After some
conversation the Italian excused himself to visit a lady in another
part of the train, leaving his message in the charge of the King’s
Messenger. Unfortunately the train split part way through the
journey, taking the Count and his inamoratas with it. The King’s
Messenger delivered the message to the Italian Embassy in London,
with the seal unbroken in the best tradition of diplomacy. No more
was heard of the Count.
There were many more
anecdotes involving, for example, Tiananmen Square and a perilous
journey involving hired tricycle vans, a flying boat to Switzerland
via Portugal in WW2 landing in Munich because of bad weather and so
on.
But why continue to
send live people around the world in an age of electronic computing
and computer generated coding systems? Well, anything sent over the
ether can be captured – and diplomatic sources are fiercely
monitored. No code is any good after three months. Signals can be
trapped and stretched so that code breakers can operate in real
time. There is no substitute for a trusted, resourceful (and
courageous) servant.
There were many
questions. For example: how are Queen’s Messenger’s recruited?
Basically anyone between the ages of 40 and 50 can apply. The great
majority (currently 13 out of 16) are ex-service. This is not
surprising for a number of reasons, because service careers usually
terminate well before those of civilians and service wives have
become tolerant of long periods of separation. A question about
passports led John to draw attention to a small display of
Diplomatic and Queen’s Messenger passports which he had brought with
him and which attracted much attention afterwards.
In all this was one
of the most interesting speakers we have had recently and Members
enthusiastically endorsed the Chairman’s closing words of
appreciation.
The meeting ended in
good time at 3.10 pm with the Probus toast.
Brian Jackson
September -
Kempton Nature
Reserve by Kristine Boudreau
The
Chairman welcomed our Speaker, Kristine Boudreau who was to
address us on the subject of the Thames Water Nature Reserve at
Kempton
After Lunch the
Chairman proposed the Loyal Toast and then introduced our
Speaker, Kristine is an American by birth but has a French
father and an English mother. She first attended Washington
University in Saint Louis and the took a Master’s degree at the
University of Colorado, her home State. She is an ecologist and
has also studied in Russia. Her career aim is to promote and
enhance biodiversity and to encourage public access to sites of
scientific interest for recreational and educational purposes.
In the Greater
London area there is a growing interest in small sites such as
Isleworth, home of two breeds or rare snail: the German hairy
(which is not in fact hirsute) and the two lipped door snail. In
Bexley there are rare water voles.
The Kempton site
became available when Thames Water declared several reservoirs
redundant. Several to the west were devoted to historical
machinery, including the waterworks railway: to the east is the
Kempton Nature Reserve, still shielded by its original
embankment. It had its first Warden in 1996. Kristine herself
has been in post as Site Manager since 2003.Over the last ten
years features have been added and there are now one and a half
miles of walks, a boardwalk, a variety of habitats, two hides, a
viewing screen, mud straits and channels for water voles and
other amphibians.
Kristine
described the bitterns as “like synchronised swimmers”. A
particular pride of KNR is the fact that avocets have bred
there: believed to be the first observed inland for 150 years in
the U.K. There were just two chicks, one of which was taken by a
sparrow hawk after about three months. Marsh harriers have been
seen and spoonbills in May. There is a kestrel which appears
with amazing punctuality at one o’ clock each day.
Grass snakes
and marsh voles are quite common. It is also a habitat for the
great crested newt and water turtles are seen occasionally. The
highlights are the avocets, bitterns, greenshank, little ringed
plover, willow tit and red-backed shrike.
Sadly even such
a precious facility as an urban nature reserve attracts
vandalism and so there are nine volunteer wardens who counter
disturbances to breeding sites and (surprisingly) graffiti. The
site is surrounded by a steel palisade with bolted uprights, all
of which have had to be welded on. One youth was found impaled
to one of these posts which generated a degree of unchristian
glee. Another cause for satisfaction was the arrest of three
boys because their tag signs were found on a police database.
The Friends of
KNR was established in 2003 and now boasts a membership of 322.
They organise events such as photographic contests, moth walks
and fun work parties. The cost of membership is £20 p.a. for
individuals; £30 for families. The site is open to Friends
throughout the year but to the public generally only on specific
days announced in the local press.
Kristine
has a very attractive personality and her talk was received
enthusiastically. She answered questions ranging from enquiries
about specific inhabitants to issues of access to the public.
The website of KNR is at
www.kemptonbirds.org.uk
The Chairman
thanked Kristine warmly and closed the meeting at 3.15. p.m.
with the Probus toast.
Brian Jackson
October - English Manorial
System by Lieutenant Colonel Molyneaux-Childs

The Chairman then welcomed our
Speaker for the day, Lt. Col. Molyneaux-Childs who was to
address us on the subject of The English Manorial System.
After Lunch the Chairman
proposed the Loyal Toast and then introduced our Speaker, Lt.
Col. Molyneaux-Childs. John Childs has effectually had two
careers: one as a mechanical engineer and chairman of six
electronics companies and one in historical research an interest
which was triggered while at prep school. He subsequently
inherited the Lordships in Surrey of the manors of Dedswell and
Papworth.
This presentation was based on
very well produced slides illustrating a series of topics
covered in John’s book “The Evolution the English Manorial
System, which he had on sale. First he addressed the word
“manor” itself. This has always two meanings: first a
substantial house but more frequently in medieval England a unit
of property in a landed estate which was an area of legal
jurisdiction, but did not necessarily contain the residence of
its lord.
The essence of the feudal
system, which originated in the military policy of the tribes of
northern Europe, was that the ultimate title to all land in a
kingdom vested in the King but that it could be held by
sub-proprietors (vassals) in exchange for a commitment to the
provision of arms and men in times of war. It was introduced by
William soon after the Conquest after a threat of invasion from
the Danes.
The Doomsday Book – or rather
books, Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk were recorded in a smaller
supplementary volume – is housed in the Public Record Office and
has recently been re-bound undoing poor work carried out in
Victorian times. It is an inventory created to form a basis for
taxation. It was completed in a year and its purpose was clearly
well understood because local jurors were active in disputing
values attributed. Its second but very important use was as a
record of the extent and ownership of land. As such it was a
definitive authority which could not be disputed. It was also
the best indication we now have of the population of the country
(of England: Scotland, most of Wales and parts of the far north
were excluded). Only men were counted – excluding clergy, monks
and nuns, women and children. Modern estimates are constructed
by applying a multiplier of 5.4 to the count. By this method the
population covered by Doomsday was 1,687,500
Almost all of the legal
functions of the Manorial System are now defunct but they were
once considerable. Most important were the Courts Baron. These
were supposed to be held every three weeks although the
frequency was much attenuated from the 15th Century
onwards. The judgements were made by the assembled body of the
tenant (the homage); later by juries drawn from the homage. The
business was minor cases of debt, contract, trespass and
assault, breaches of custom, enforcing the rules of open field
husbandry and offences of nuisance. Major theft and violence
were the prerogative of the Crown. Punishments were by fines,
the stocks or enforced work. The courts were customarily
presided over by the Steward or sometimes the Lord of the Manor.
There was a hierarchy of
officials in a manor the most important of which was the
Steward. Farm management was the responsibility of the Bailiff
who was accountable for the collection of rents and dues, the
exaction of fine and the seizing of heriot on the death of a
copyholder (sub- tenant). In many manors there was an ale –
taster whose job was to assess the quality and price of bread
and alcoholic drink produced for sale. He had the power to exact
fines on behalf of the Lord but the mechanism acted more as a
licensing fee system than as a way of maintaining quality
standards.
In his own manors
Molyneaux-Childe likes to “revive” customs for purely
entertainment purposes, the Ale Taster being a popular character
as the centre of jollifications. We were shown a lot of slides
of these events.
One slight mystery was
Molyneaux-Childs’s military title which suggested a part of his
life which he did not speak of.
The talk well over-ran its
allotted time and created a great deal of interest, evidenced by
the many questions. The Chairman warmly thanked the speaker and
closed the meeting with the Probus Toast at 3.30.
Brian Jackson
November - Trafficking
endangered species by Guy Clarke

The Chairman welcomed Guy Clarke our
Speaker for the day on the subject of “Trafficking in Endangered
Species”. Guy Clarke, a customs officer based at Heathrow he had
previously specialised in drug offences but is now assigned to the
UK Border Security Agency. His rank corresponds to that of an
Inspector in the Police.
The focus of the management of
animals passing through Heathrow is a building which was formerly a
warehouse where the focus is on the health and welfare of the
animals but also the security of the public. Animals escape very
easily and can be difficult to capture. Guy cited a box of ground
squirrels from which the lid was accidentally knocked off, resulting
in an infestation which lasted several months.
Why do people import animals
covertly? The first answer to this question is that people have
always sought to avoid the quarantine regulations - and this is true
even for non endangered species. But rare animals can have a high
cash value and the internet has provided collectors and sellers with
an efficient way of contacting each other. For example dwarf
tortoises can change hands for £170 each. A recent box of 713
therefore had a street price of some £106,950.
An example of an internet trade was
a 15 year old boy who used his father’s credit card to import a
chameleon. The animal was duly detected and the family’s houses
raided – as a result of which charges were brought not only in
respect of the chameleon but because the father was found to be
trading red (agricultural) diesel fuel!
The penalty for illegal dealing in
protected species is up to 7 years’ imprisonment. We were shown
slides of two boxes of rare birds of prey – 27 in all with their
beaks taped. The two principals in the trade were each given 6 ½
years and the couriers were also caught and imprisoned.
When animals are intercepted and
confiscated they automatically become the property of the Crown and
are usually housed in zoos up and down the country. Ivory presents a
rather different problem, but apparently some of it has gone to
repair inlays in damaged woodwork in Windsor Castle.

Another example of the incentives
for wrongdoing is the common monkey. All breeds are protected but
some can be bought in Africa for as little as $5. These would still
change hands in Moscow for upwards of $150. The problem with monkeys
is not just that some are rare but all can carry human disease.
There is actually a trade in monkey
flesh, also – usually smoked. A smoked monkey can fetch as much as
£500.
Sometimes customs officers receive
intelligence about illegal cargoes but more often they simply rely
on the visual evidence of packaging. More recently sniffer dogs have
been specially trained.
Guy’s
remarks were well illustrated by his PowerPoint presentation. We saw
padlocked boxes shown closed, and then opened to reveal 292 kilos of
ivory, representing the skeletons of 20 elephants. In an even larger
haul (690 kilos) there were whole trunks that each needed two people
to carry them. These would have been headed to the dental industry –
although there is no legal market in this country. An allied trade
is in animal parts such as rhino horn ( a confiscated example shown
left) or tiger bone which is highly valued in traditional Chinese
medicine.
Plants as well as animals come
within the ambit of the Customs Service. There are approximately 32,
000 protected species, many of them being orchids. These can
sometimes be returned to the country of origin. A consignment of
rare Mexican cacti, for example, was sent back to the exact area of
origin in Mexico because the packaging contained GPS co-ordinates.
Some hiding places are bizarre. Two
Labrador puppies found at Schipol, for example, were x-rayed and
found to have packages of cocaine inside them: one died as a result.
And in the U.S. rare snakes have been found in car exhausts.

After his formal presentation Guy
answered questions. An enquirer wanted to know whether other
countries in Europe organise their policing of biological traffic in
the same way as we do. It seems that there are similarities and
differences. Italy, for example, has an independent service which
supervises crops and woodlands and it is specifically represented at
points of arrival and departure. The Netherlands and Spain also have
specialised investigation services; France, on the other hand, is
“more informal”. Of the countries newly in the EC, Poland and
Slovakia are said to have new and very effective enforcement
procedures.
Another questioner was interested in
the methodology of identifying suspects. This is partly basic custom
officer training – profiling people, body language: the “Revenue
Nose”. But there is also the question of journey origin – Nigeria,
say, being at one end of the scale and Iceland at the other.
Seaports are another matter. Passengers from a cruise liner are more
likely to be smuggling in valuables such as jewellery, but crew
members might well have parrots or monkeys.
Back to ivory, the cut- off year is
1947. Any ivory owned in UK and proved to have been imported
before1947 dos not create a problem, although a licence would be
required to export it. Later imports are strictly speaking illegal.
Guy’s talk was very well presented
and illustrated. The Chairman thanked him warmly and then closed the
meeting at 3.00 with the Probus Toast.
Brian
Jackson
December - Mayor’s charity by Shiraz Mirza
pre reading only a report will
follow the presentation